#Usb 2 vs usb 3 oppo 205 install#
#Usb 2 vs usb 3 oppo 205 tv#

Hooray! It's had an immediate and substantive effect. The contractor was willing to run my CAT6a and fiber-optic cables as part of that job.

#Usb 2 vs usb 3 oppo 205 install#

The main motivation for the renovation was to install a washer and dryer, which required running new AC lines from a new breaker box (near the music system) to the new laundry (close to the modem/router and NAS). I tried playing them from a local, directly connected USB drive, but that didn't help, probably because I was then using a less potent server than the Prodigy X. With the latter, the LAN speed from NAS to server was a respectable 350Mbs, which served me welluntil the processing of DSD256 and DXD files revealed the limits of the setup.

#Usb 2 vs usb 3 oppo 205 tv#

The solution, at first, was a pair of Ethernet Powerline adaptersdevices that enable the transmission of data through household AC wiringwhich I later replaced with much faster and more reliable MoCA adapters, which operate over the coaxial cables already installed for TV by the cable company. That means I haven't been able to tunnel an Ethernet cable from my modem and router in the room containing my NAS drives directly to the room where my music system lives. My apartment is part of a Manhattan fortress of concrete and steel.

Unfortunately, it didn't make much of a difference with my dozen or so DXD files, but why? After all, DXDs are really PCM files of equivalent data density to DSD64, and obviously don't have to be converted to PCM, thereby eliminating a process needed for DSD256. The trouble was that applying all these operations to the highest-resolution multichannel files≽SD256 and 24-bit/352.8kHz PCM (DXD)was still just beyond my system's grasp: playback of the whole enchilada, including all apps, was often plagued by infuriating interruptions for buffering.īaetis's new, fully kitted-out Prodigy X, with i7-7700K at 4.2GHz CPU, 512GB RAM, 1TB SSD drive, SOtM tX-USBhubIN output, and HD-Plex linear power supply, is now running the latest versions of Roon and JRiver Media Center (respectively v1.3/build 247 and v23.0.36), and indeed it did eliminate those occasional hiccups when processing and playing multichannel DSD256a relief and a pleasure, as I have a lot of those files. The Baetises even handled the additional tasks of on-the-fly file conversion, downsampling, upsampling, convolutions, room equalization, and output via Signalyst's HQPlayer app. Third, we installed an updated Baetis Prodigy X server.Īs for the Prodigy X: In the past, the Baetis servers, with their Intel Core i7 processors, did a bang-up job with every stereo and multichannel music file, including many that had overwhelmed proprietary server hardware based on lesser processors. Second, we improved the networking that connects our network-attached storage (NAS) with the music room by installing both copper CAT6A and fiber-optic links between the two rooms in place of MoCA (Multimedia over CoAxial) links. Now, the power amps and subs at the other end of the room also have their own dedicated circuit. The main rack components retain their dedicated 20A circuit, which feeds them through an AudioQuest Niagara 5000 power conditioner.

Now that it's all over, I'm grateful to have it backand grateful for the improvements in the main system, some of them direct byproducts of the renovation.įirst, we replaced the circuit-breaker box, to increase the current and add circuits. We could listen to music with our little 3.1-channel TV system in the den ( eh) or through headphones (not!), or we could decamp to our house in Connecticut, which we did as much as possible. To survive the dust and grit of the renovation of our Manhattan apartment, all electronics had to be covered with heavy plastic, the speakers encapsulated in large green lawn bags, and the listening room partitioned off with a temporary wall. For some months now, I've lived mostly without music.